already in action (deaton)Ħ/ The better Lawyers, will not be bitching over Brad & Chris getting rich off our backs,īUT representing these large investment funds in their impending losses. On the grounds of inaction and complacency on the part of THE SEC. Tripple standards at play here, of morality, negligence of responsibilities, conflict of interests.ĥ/ this will overload courts with successive claims from individuals, investment funds, pension funds etc.
Or is crashing the value of said market with law suits regarding events that have not yet occurred more acceptable by regulatorsĤ/ This was an SEC regulated Fundraising contract / transaction. The regulators allow this ?.ĮVEN If the company was seen/suspected of breaching regulations prior to this round of fundraising,Ĭan the SEC be held responsible for allowing this? we shal see. Lets be fair about this, Is this better than Ripple knowingly selling into a market that actually consumes their sales, This is the sort of activity the SEC should be preventing, Whilst at the same time their mantra is saying they are protecting investors like you & me. They, after all are an accredited investor, they know what they are getting into, right.Ģ/ Tetragon are just making sure Ripple doesn't spend OR lose all their available convertable cash.Īnd can return their C round cash if shtf, fair enough, if you can get this kind of security, pun.ģ/ The law & regulations allow them to make these damaging claims & lawsuits before any determination has been made, 1/ Tetragon Knew when they gambled their money, that XRP may one day be declared a security Ĭlearly, enough to have a contingency clause discussed & written in their contract to get their money back in such an event.
0 kommentar(er)
